20- Alonzo Chamberlain Moves to Winnebago County, Illinois

On May 1, 1855 Alonzo Chamberlain loaded his wife and two children on a stage coach and traveled forty miles to Montpelier. There they caught a west bound passenger train to start a new life on the western frontier in Winnebago County, Illinois, ten miles south of Beloit, Wisconsin. When he arrived he had only $1.75 in his pocket. He bought a $5 cook stove and paid for it in work.1

Alonzo and his family traveled by Railroad from Montpelier Vermont to Beloit, Wisconsin to their new home in Winnebago County on the western frontier in 1855.

Why did Alonzo leave Glover and why was he broke? There are many unanswered questions about Alonzo after he left. However, a sequence of events before he left, may give some insight.

Alonzo Chamberlian

Lydia Blanchard Chamberlain

Alonzo had two children, Amanda and Harry when his wife Betsy died April 25, 1852. His father Spencer was living with him, but moved to his daughter Jeanette’s home sometime between 1850 and before the time Spencer died on December 21, 1853.

Alonzo purchased two adjoining  lots in the village of Glover on April 11 and May 5, 1853. Alonzo and his new wife Lydia Blanchard Chamberlain jointly owned this property in town. They sold it to Warren Smith on February 8, 1855 for $500. Then there was a “Transfer of Mortgage” deed from Alonzo to F. M. McLellan for $300 signed on April 12, 1855. This would leave him with only about $200 before he left Glover.23

John Harry Chamberlain

His son Harry wrote that Alonzo had “received letters from some friends who had moved to northern Illinois, thought he saw a chance in that new country to build a home and support his family of a wife and two children more easily than he could on the barren hills of his native state.”3

School Days- Amanda and Harry Chamberlain, Winnebago County.

So, Alonzo packed his belongings into some trunks and loaded his family on a stagecoach and headed for the frontier, which “our people then thought was the land of Indians and untold dangers.”3

They arrived at their new home in Shirland, Winnebago County, Illinois on May 14, 1855. He went to work to support his family. “Wages were seventy cents a day, and twenty-five cents a cord for cutting wood… wealth did not pile up much.”3

In the 1860 census the Chamberlain family of four lived in a structure in Shirland Township, Winnebago County, but no value was shown for the property.

The Underground Railroad in northern Illinois

Alonzo Chamberlain was an abolitionist. He was known to be a conductor on the Underground Railroad in Vermont. Though we know nothing about Alonzo’s personal activities, the UGRR was very active in northern Illinois.

There were well known stops of the UGRR in Byron, Illinois and in Beloit, Wisconsin thirty miles north. Alonzo Chamberlain lived between these locations. Byron has an UGRR museum known as the Read House which was one of three “stations” in town from 1850 to 1862, where fugitive slaves were hidden.  According to the museum director, “Byron held a large group of abolitionists during that time. Most were members of the Congregational Church and came here from New England”.4

Newman House Museum, Byron, Illinois

Newman House Museum UGRR cellar room

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is interesting because his son said Alonzo had been corresponding with friends who had moved to northern Illinois. And, Alonzo’s location in Shirland, Winnebago County, twenty miles north of Byron filled a needed gap between Byron and known UGRR safe houses in Wisconsin.

Also, there is an UGRR museum in Milton, Wisconsin called Milton House. It is near Janesville about thirty miles north of Shirland.

It was built in 1844 and has a distinctive hexagon shaped design and a basement where fugitives were hid. There was a 45 foot tunnel from the basement to a nearby cabin.4

This 45-foot long tunnel originally was 3′ high and caved in often.  (Jon McGinty photo)

 

Milton House UGRR museum built in 1844 near Janesville Wisconsin. There is a 45′ tunnel between basement and nearby cabin.

 

 

 Winnebago County Sheriff John Taylor and Alfred Countryman

The history of Winnebago County can give us great insight into the life and times of the Chamberlain family. As pioneers in this new land, they were certainly affected by both local and national events.

On November 11, 1856, Sheriff John Taylor was nearing the end of his term. A new sheriff of Winnebago County had been elected a few days earlier. Sheriff Taylor was looking forward to spending more time on his farm with his expectant wife and eighteen month old son.6

That day, two brothers, Alfred and John Countryman herded some cattle into Rockford from another county. They offered the cattle for sale at such a low price it raised suspicion. The purchasers withheld payment and notified the sheriff. Upon investigation, Sheriff Taylor arrested the men on suspicion of cattle rustling and searched them for weapons. He found a pistol ball in Alfred’s pocket and asked for the pistol, but said he had none.5,6

Sheriff Taylor assisted by the Constable escorted the prisoners to the jailhouse steps where Alfred broke loose. He leaped the fence on Elm Street and ran down the street to the livery stables. The sheriff pursued and was about to seize him. Countryman drew a concealed pistol and fired behind him striking the sheriff. He staggered a few steps and fell. His last words were “I am shot, catch him!“5

Many infuriated citizens chased him to the woods north of Kent’s creek where John Platt caught him. With assistance, he wrestled away his pistol and subdued him. Amid threats of lynching, they took him to jail. Sheriff-elect Samuel Church secured the captive with irons.

Alfred Countryman went to trial on February 24 for the murder of Sheriff Taylor. The prosecution and the defense presented their case and it went to a jury of twelve men. On Friday March 6 they returned with a verdict: “Guilty”. The judge sentenced him to be hanged.

Winnebago County’s first public execution was scheduled for the afternoon of Friday March 27, 1857. It was a major event. People started crowding into town the evening before, coming from as far as Dubuque, Iowa. Two special trains arrived from the west at daybreak. Rockford was packed solid with horses, carriages and people. An estimated 8000 citizens gathered at Sheriff Church’s farm, a short distance from town. (Other newspapers estimated 15,000 and 20,000 attendees).5,6

The prisoner arrived in a procession of five horse drawn carriages. The last carriage carried the Countryman family, father, brother, and sister. His wife and his mother chose to say their goodbyes at the jail. Two fire companies armed with sabers and carbines accompanied the procession. The armed guard escorted the prisoner safely to the scaffold.5,6

The Reverend Hooper Crews began the ceremony with earnest prayer. The prisoner then made a short speech and expressed repentance and forgiveness for his crime. At seventeen minutes past the hour of two, the bolt was withdrawn. The trap door fell and Countryman was “swung into eternity”.5 The immense concourse of people did not move for some time. Only the sobs of the family were heard above the silence of the multitude.6

Before the body was taken down, Sheriff Church addressed the crowd. He praised and thanked them for their order. Then he spoke these words: “These painful proceedings being now concluded, and the sword of justice is about to be returned to its sheath, I hope never again to be drawn with so much severity”.5

The new anti-slavery party

In the 1850s, the issue of slavery absorbed the minds of the people, and none more so than Alonzo Chamberlain. We can only speculate on the roll politics played in Alonzo’s decision to move to Illinois. There is no doubt, however, that he was now in the center of the action.

Democrat Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois introduced a bill that would allow settlers to choose whether slavery would or would not exist within a territory. He hoped the bill would satisfy the interests of both the North and the South. The Kansas-Nebraska act dissolved the terms of the Missouri Compromise and allowed slave or free status to be decided in the territories by popular sovereignty. This would likely extend slavery into the newly opening territories.

Douglas’ bill sparked outrage and protests in the northern states.  A small, dedicated group of individuals came together to pledge to fight against the spread of slavery. In a small school house in Ripon, Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, they organized a new party. They chose the name the “Republican Party”.

“A house divided against itself cannot stand”

Abraham Lincoln 1859

On June 16, 1858 in Springfield, Illinois, Abraham Lincoln accepted the nomination of the Republican Party to oppose Stephen A. Douglas in the race for the U. S. Senate. In his speech accepting the nomination, he paraphrased a passage from the Bible, Mark 3:25: “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

Lincoln continued:

“I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.”

These words obviously made a deep impression on Alonzo Chamberlain as Lincoln’s words from this event were quoted at Alonzo’s funeral forty-four years later. “Like Abraham Lincoln, he (Alonzo) thought and said this nation could not live part slave and part free”2

The Lincoln – Douglas Debates

Alonzo Chamberlain probably attended one or more of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates

The Senate campaign of 1858 involved seven three hour debates between the two candidates. Each debate was held in a different congressional district. The format was that the first candidate spoke for one hour, the second then had one hour and a half, and then the first had an half hour to finish. Spontaneous  comments, cheers and laughter from the audience punctuated the debates.

On August 27, 1858 the second debate was held at Freeport, Illinois about twenty miles southwest of Shirland. On a cool, damp day, special trains brought in an estimated 15,000 from all over northern Illinois.7 Freeport is the one debate location, if not more than one, that Alonzo would attend if possible.

At this location, Lincoln spoke first and answered the “interrogatories” which Douglas had raised in the previous debate. Douglas then began by complementing the audience for avoiding “vulgarity and blackguardism” while Lincoln was speaking. Douglas then spoke for an hour and a half, often playing the race card with an occasional racial slur and by repeatedly calling Lincoln’s party the “Black Republican Party”.

Lincoln then began his reponse:

“The first thing I have to say to you is a word in regard to Judge Douglas’s declaration about the ‘vulgarity and blackguardism’ in the audience- that no such thing, as he says, was shown by any Democrat while I was speaking. Now, I only wish, by way of reply on this subject, to say that while I was speaking, I used no ‘vulgarity or blackguardism’ toward any Democrat.” (Great laughter and applause)7

Douglas had long advocated that under popular sovereignty the settlers in each new territory would decide their own status as a slave or free state; and that this would allow northern and southern states to resume peaceful coexistence.

Lincoln, however, responded that the Dred Scott decision sealed the fate of the country with one of only two possible outcomes: the country would inevitably become either all slave or all free. In 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott, a slave who moved to Wisconsin with his master, was not a U. S. citizen even though he was in a free territory. In other words, residence in a free territory did not make Scott free. Also, that Congress had no constitutional authority to prohibit slavery in any territory. The decision effectively overturned the Missouri Compromise, and all of other political compromises negotiated between the North and South over the past 30 years.

At Freeport, Stephen Douglas argued that, in spite of the Dred Scott decision, slavery could be excluded from territories of the United States by local legislation. This became know as the Freeport Doctrine.

The Presidential Election of 1860

Abraham Lincoln lost the 1858 Senate race. However, the debates of 1858 gave him national stature. At the Republican convention, May 18, 1860 in Chicago, Lincoln over took William H. Seward of New York on the third ballot and received the nomination for President. Republicans opposed the extension of slavery into the territories.8

Douglas’ Freeport doctrine and popular sovereignty pleased Democrats in Illinois. However, these angered Southern Democrats, and the national Democrat Party was in turmoil. In April at the Democratic Convention at Charleston, SC, delegates from the Southern states pulled out and no nomination could be made. They held a second convention in June at Baltimore, MD. Stephen Douglas got the Democrat Party nomination, but Southern Democrats nominated Vice President John C. Breckenridge, a slave owner from Kentucky. Both Douglas and Breckenridge claimed to be the official Democratic candidates.8

The Constitution Union Party nominated John Bell of Tennessee. They, like the Whig Party before them, believed the best strategy was to ignore the issue of slavery.

1860 U. S. Presidential Election

Lincoln understood the value of unity. He campaigned to keep the Party united. Douglas actively campaigned in both the North and in the South where he gave a passionate defense of the Union and strenuously opposed secession.

On election day, November 6, 1860, Alonzo Chamberlain cast his vote for Abraham Lincoln, as he would for every Republican Presidential candidate for the rest of his life. With about 40% of the popular vote, Lincoln won in all the northern states except New Jersey. This gave him 180 electoral votes, enough to win the electoral college and the election. By the time of Lincoln’s inauguration in March, seven Southern states had seceded, and a month after Lincoln became president, the country became engaged in civil war.8

A complete victory in the battle at Antietam Creek might have decided the war, one way or the other

The rebellion of the Southern states and the Civil War opened the opportunity for Abraham Lincoln to free the slaves. President Lincoln first proposed the Emancipation Proclamation to his Cabinet in July 1862. However, his cabinet opposed it. Secretary of State William Seward suggested waiting for a Union victory so that it might be credible that the government could enforce it. Lincoln drew up the document and patiently waited for an elusive Union victory.9

In mid 1862, the Union suffered three devastating defeats at Shanandoah, Richmond and Manassas, Virginia. With the War going badly, the Democrats began an anti-war campaign. They saw the opportunity to take over the House of Representatives in the November mid-term election. To make things worse, France and Great Britain were enduring a cotton shortage and were considered legitimizing the Confederacy.10,11

Confederate General Robert E. Lee, recognizing the dissent in the North, hoped a major battle won on Union soil might topple Lincoln’s congressional support and secure complete victory. His Confederate forces moved into West Virginia where Stonewall Jackson captured Harpers Ferry. Lee then moved his army to Sharpsburg, Maryland.

September 17, 1862, General Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia met Union General George McClellan’s Army of the Potomac at Antietam Creek. The two armies faced each other across a 30 acre corn field. In twelve hours of battle there were about 23,000 casualties. An estimated 3,650 died. It was the deadliest single day in all American military history.

The next day Lee began the retreat of his ravaged troops back to Virginia. Despite having the advantage, McClellan allowed Lee to retreat without resistance. Lincoln was furious! He believed McClellan missed the opportunity to attack the weakened Army of Northern Virginia and potentially end the war. After refusing Lincoln’s orders to pursue Lee’s retreating troops, Lincoln removed McClellan from command on November 5, 1862.10

The Emancipation Proclamation

Military historians consider the Battle of Antietam a stalemate. However, the routing of the Confederates from Maryland enabled President Lincoln to claim a Union victory.  On September 22, 1862, Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation. If the Southern states did not cease their rebellion, it would go into effect on January 1, 1863.

Lincoln justified this action as a “fit and necessary war measure” intended to cripple the Confederacy’s use of slaves in the war effort. The ending of slavery in the United States  now became the focus of the Civil War. Unwilling to appear pro-slavery, England and France decided not to endorse the Confederacy, and the Republicans held the House of Representatives in the mid-term election. Also, over 200,000 African-Americans served in the Union army and navy.9

President Lincoln considered the Emancipation Proclamation to be the crowning achievement of his presidency. “I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper,” he declared. “If my name ever goes into history it will be for this act, and my whole soul is in it.”9

The Proclamation initially freed only the slaves in the rebellious states, but by the end of the war, citizens were more prepared to accept abolition for all slaves in both the North and South. The 13th Amendment to the Constitution abolished slavery in the United States on December 6th, 1865.9

Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address: “That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom”

“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

“Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.”

“But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”.

Abraham Lincoln

William Warren in the Civil War

William Warren was born in Stephenson county, Illinois, April 10, 1840. His father died when he was three months old. Therefore, he soon learned to depend on his own resources. He spent his youthful years working on a farm in Winnebago County.  There, he not only learned how to work the fields, but also received early lessons on industry, perseverance and integrity. When civil war broke out, he joined the Fourth Battery of the Wisconsin Light Artillery on November 10, 1861.12

Battle of Malvern Hill, water color by Sneden

The Fourth Battery of Artillery participated in the battle of Malvern Hill on July 1, 1862. There, Union artillery on the hill dueled with Confederate batteries on both the right and left sides of their lines, inflicting heavy losses. They repelled the Confederate Army, a great tactical victory for the Union. The next day, however, Union General George B. McClellan retreated, ending  his Peninsula Campaign to take the Confederate Capitol of Richmond.13,14

On April 11, 1863 the Fourth Artillery defended the Union Garrison at Suffolk, Virginia from the attack of Longstreet, holding until the siege was abandoned.

During encampment at Gloucester Point in August, 1863 the unit experienced a severe bout of sickness. For a while, there were only four enlisted men fit for duty.13

In March 1864, Ulysiss S. Grant was promoted to lieutenant general, and given command of all Union armies.15

On May 9, 1864, the Fourth Artillary took position in front of rebel Fort Clifton where Swift Creek meets the Appomattox. There they silenced the enemy guns within a half an hour. Four days later they marched to Proctor’s Run near Drury’s Bluff. There they engaged the enemy’s fortifications, losing one man wounded.13

In June, 1864 William Warren’s artillery unit was attached to General Kautz’ Cavalry Division and on the June 15th they, as part of the U. S. Army of the Potomic, became engaged in the battle of Petersburg,  Petersburg was an important supply center for the Confederate capitol of Richmond. General Kautz penetrated enemy lines which left him the dilemma of how to get back out. Under fire from fourteen guns, they escaped with the loss of three men wounded.13

By order of General Butler, the entire Fourth Battery Artillery was converted to a horse artillery, with all cannoniers being mounted. Then, on September 28, 1864, General Kautz’ cavalry, and the mounted Fourth Battery approached Richmond within 1000 yards of the rebel works. On the 29th they moved around the city under continuous rebel fire. The right section engaged a small force of the enemy on Charles City Road and drove them into the city. The next day, September 30th, the battery repulsed a cavalry charge.13

On October 7th, a heavy rebel force attacked the cavalry. The Fourth Battery of Artillery opened fire but could not stop the enemy advance. They then began receiving heavy fire from their left. Another large force of Confederates came at them from the right to cut off escape. They fell back four times while keeping up rapid fire. The rebels continued to press toward them, the order was given to retreat.13

Near a creek, the cavalry and artillery units got jammed together. An artillery piece got stuck in the mud and blocked those who were behind. Four cannons had to be abandoned and forty-five horses were lost. Private Isaacson was killed and Private Brooks, J. Flanders, L. Wells, and W. Warren were wounded.13  A piece of a shell struck William in the right leg disabling him. He had to remain in a hospital in Philadelphia for the rest 1864 and early 1865.12

The Siege of Petersburg from June 1864 to March 1865 led to the surrender of Lee’s army in April 1865 and the effective end of the Civil War.15  William Warren received an honorable discharge on April 14, 1865.12

William Warren married Amanda Chamberlain, Winnebago County, Illinois

Amanda Chamberlain age 19 and William Warren age 20.

William Warren returned to his home in Winnebago County where he spent several months recuperating his health. He then went to work on his farm. William married Miss Amanda Chamberlain February 25, 1866.12

In 1870, Alonzo Chamberlain was a farmer and his son Harry worked as a farm laborer. They owned a small farm in Shirland, Winnebago county valued at $1170. At that time, William and Amanda Warren had two children Nora and Florence. William Warren’s farm in Shirland was valued at $2100 plus he had $595 in personal property. Also, two farm laborers were living in their home.16

 

To be continued…. Chapter 21 Harry Chamberlain– leaves Winnebago County for Clay County Iowa. Homesteader, teacher, politician, lawyer and family man.

If you got this far, please click Goodbye or Table of Contents. This will simply tell me that someone looked at this post.

Six minute Video: Why the black race has not prospered since 1965

Thank you! Dennis Chamberlain

© Copyright Dennis D. Chamberlain, The Chamberlain Story, 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of the written content of this site without express and written permission from the author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that credit is given to Dennis D. Chamberlain and direction to  www.thechamberlainstory.com.

References:

1- Harry Ellis Chamberlain, Biography of Alonzo Chamberlain, unpublished family document
2- Sale of Property “Alonzo & Lydia Chamberlain to Warren Smith” and email information from Joan Alexander, Glover Historical Society.
3- Memoir of Harry Chamberlain
4- Local Ties to the Underground Railroad http://northwestchicagoland.northwestquarterly.com/2011/01/local-ties-to-the-underground-railroad/
5- Charles A. Church, The History of Rockford and Winnebago County- From First Settlement in 1834 to the Civil War, Rockford, Ill., W. P. Lamb, printer, 1900.
6- Robert H. Borden, WINNEBAGO COUNTY’S FIRST EXECUTION, Nuggets of History, Vol 18, Number 3
7- Second debate: Freeport, Illinois, National Park Service https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/debate2.htm
8-The U. S. Presidential Election of 1860, https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1860
9- Civil War Trust, 10 Facts: The Emancipation Proclamation,
https://www.civilwar.org/learn/articles/10-facts-emancipation-proclamation
10- The Battle of Antietam,  https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/battle-of-antietam
11- Civil War Battles Chart, https://www.iss.k12.nc.us/
12- History of Clay County, Iowa page 393.
13- Military History of Wisconsin, http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/ref/collection/quiner/id/17199
14- Michael P. Gabriel, The Battle of Malvern Hill, Encyclopedia Virginia, https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Malvern_Hill_Battle_of
15- The End of the Civil War, LUMEN, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-ushistory/chapter/the-end-of-the-civil-war/
16- 1870 U. S. Census

E6- Sir Isaac Newton: the Athanasian Creed and Bible Prophecy

“A man may imagine things that are false, but he can only understand things that are true.” -Isaac Newton

Isaac Newton wrote over 1.3 million words on the prophecies of the Bible and Church History, especially writings of Athanasias and the Arians.1  While Newton’s spectacular scientific achievements have received universal acclaim, his theological writings have gotten mixed reviews. Critics of his theology often use negative terms to describe him as “an Arian” or “a dark heretic”.  This author, however, believes that Newton’s theology was as brilliant as his science, and an extension of his search for truth regardless of the prevailing thought of his day.

Isaac Newton

Newton was an Anglican, devoted to his Christian faith. He searched the Scriptures and did an intense study of the early writers of Christian history. He focused on fourth century church history when Athanasias defended the Nicene Creed against its Arian rivals. To understand Isaac Newton’s writings of Church history it may be helpful to review the Council at Nicea and the Arian controversy.

The Council at Nicea

In 325 AD, the Emperor Constantine called together a council of bishops from all over the Empire. Over 300 Christian bishops gathered in Nicea, a small city near Constantinople. In an attempt to bring unity to the church, Contantine would use the power of the state to force theological agreement among Christians.2

A major controversy had erupted in Alexandria which threatened to split the entire Eastern Church. Arius, a popular presbyter, argued that the Word was not co-eternal with God which, he argued, denied the divinity of Jesus. And, If both the Father and Jesus Christ were divine, there were two Gods, which denied Christian monotheism. During the Council, Eusebius of Nicomedia presented the Arian case. The other bishops shouted him down.2

The Holy Trinity

The Council quickly became convinced that they needed to make a clear rejection of Arianism. Therefore, under imperial prompting, they set out to produce a creed which would define the faith of the Church.3

In describing Jesus Christ and the Father, Constantine suggested that the word homoousios, which translated means “of the same substance,” be included in the creed. There were a few bishops who refused to sign the creed. The assembly disposed them as heritics.2 

However, in 328 AD, Constantine revoked  the banishment of Arius and Arianism again began gaining ground.

Athanasias and the Arian controversy

It was about this time that Alexander, bishop of Alexandria died, and Athanasias reluctantly took his place. Athanasias showed a deep conviction that the central fact of Christian faith is the incarnation of God in Jesus Christ and the presence of God amid humankind. Eusebius of Nicomedia and the other Arian leaders immediatly took steps to cause his downfall.4

Accusations by Eusebius, riled up Constantine sufficiently that he banish Athanasias from Alexandria. Eusebius baptised Constantine who now favored the Arian cause. Shortly thereafter, Constantine died and his three sons, Constantine II, Constans and Constantius succeeded him.4

When Athanasias was away, the Arians claimed that he was no longer the legitimate bishop of Alexandria. The rival bishop, Gregory, had the support of the government and took over possession of the church buildings. To avoid violence, Anthanasias left Alexandria and went to Rome.4

In Rome Athanasais was able to gain support of Julius the bishop of Rome and the Roman Clergy, who took up the Nicene cause. Eventually, a synod declared that Athanasius was the legitimate bishop and Gregory was out. Gregory and the Arians had represented the more Hellenized higher classes. Athanasias was a man of the people and came back as a hero and liberator. He then began to strengthen ties with other Nicenes and wrote a number of treatises against Arianism.4

Constantius, an Arian, was Emperor in 352 AD. He sent an army to again remove Athanasias from Alexandria. Athanasias escaped and took refuge among his allies, the monks in the desert. He hid there for a period of about five years. The Nicene cause suffered severe setbacks at this time. In Sirmium, a council openly rejected the decisions of Nicea. Orthodox leaders called this the “Blasphemy of Sirmium.”4

Another twist in the story came when Emperor Constantius died and his cousin Julian the pagan replaced him. Julian had no interest in either side of the controversy. He, therefore, cancelled all orders of exiled bishops so that each side would have an equal opportunity to destroy the other.  Julian could then move forward with his goal to re-establish paganism.4

Athanasias returned to Alexandria. There he engaged in a much needed campaign of theological diplomacy. He realized that even many non-Arians opposed the Nicene Creed because of the term homoousios (of the same substance). Athanasias, seeing these legitimate concerns, reversed his stand he had fiercely held at Nicea. The synod at Alexandria decided it would now be acceptable to affirm that the Son was homoiousios (of similar substance) with the Father. On this basis of understanding most of the church rallied to support the Council of Nicea. It was later ratified at the Second Ecumenical Council at Constantinople in 381 AD.4

Was Isaac Newton an Arian?

What did Isaac Newton himself really believe about this great debate and the creeds which defined the Trinity? Which side, if either, did he favor in the dispute between Athanasias and his allies (the Nicenes), and Eusebius and his allies (the Arians)?

Isaac Newton examined church history writings written before, and compared them with those written after the Arian controversy. He said of the pre-Nicene authors, a “familiar difficulty” arose in that he found a “diversity of sentiments… is sometimes apparent in the same author”.

He said there may be two causes for this: 1- The author may have used certain expressions in a way commonly used by more recent writers. Or, 2- “Audacious men may have attempted to tip his book more towards their own beliefs.” This may have been done, he said, in copying or translating from Greek to Latin, or deliberately omitting/altering  a number of words, or even by adding material of their own.5

Newton then, in an exhaustive 18 page thesis, showed examples and illustrations of second option above. He primarily aimed at the writings of Anathasias and his allies. This has prompted some critics of Newton’s theology to assume or claim that Newton was an Arian. However, this was not the case.

Newton was a devout Christian. He hoped that he would find a sound argument presented by Athanasias and the Nicenes against the Arians. The following statement by Newton clearly shows his sentiments, and his disappointment in an argument of one of the Nicene writers:

“I always think of him as being like a gardener who in attempting to correct a deformation in a young plant twists it so strongly the other way that is misses the center and he bends the shoot to the opposite side… He has gone off headlong into the opposite evil, with an excessive zeal for conflict as well. For it would have been enough if he had shown that the Father and the Son were not the same so far as the ‘subjectum’ is concerned, and if he had done so he would have carried off the first prize for his victory against the blasphemer…. The end of it was that he exchanged evil for evil and strayed from correctness of doctrine.”5

Isaac Newton declared the Arian doctrine to be blasphemy and therefore, he clearly was not an Arian. However, he did not believe in the doctrine of the Trinity as defined in the Athanasian Creed. He came to this conclusion based on his study of the Bible. Willaim Stukely wrote of Newton: “No man in England read the Bible more carefully than he did.”6

Isaac Newton believed the Bible predicted a general apostasy of the Christian Church

Newton did an extensive study on the prophecies of the book of Daniel and Revelations. In his preface to this work, he stated that he would “show that the Religion of the Beast is Christianity corrupted.” However, to do so, he said, it would be convenient to first prove through biblical writers that “there was to be a general Apostasy in the visible Church.”7 For this purpose he explained Paul’s second Epistle to Timothy chapters 3 and 4.  There Paul warned of a time when the saints would turn away their ears from hearing the truth and he exhorted Timothy to watch over his flock:

“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: & they shall turn away their ears from the truth & shall be turned unto fables.” (2 Timothy 4:3-4)7

Newton believed that this apostasy “was to be a very durable one.” It would begin in Paul’s day and last until the man of sin be revealed.7 In his second epistle to the Thessalonians, Paul taught his followers not to be troubled by rumors that the coming of the Lord was at hand. He wrote:

“Let no men deceive you by any means for that day shall not come except the Apostasy come first.” (2 Thessalonians 2:3)7

Was Isaac Newton a heretic?

Newton was neither an Trinitarian nor an Arian. He believed that both of these groups had wandered away from teachings of the Bible into metaphysical speculation.8 However, Sir Isaac took great pleasure in the service of the Church of England.  In turn, that church entirely claimed him as her son, in faith, and in practice.6

Nevertheless, by 1670 Newton faced real concerns about his religious beliefs. The conflict between his great love for the Scriptures and his doubts about the Trinity caused him considerable stress and anxiety. He became racked with inner turmoil. He was now an important figure at Trinity College and all professors were expected to take holy orders and become ordained priests in the Church of England. This meant that he had to swear an oath on the Bible that he believed in the Trinity. This he could not do. Newton continually delayed. However, he was required to be ordained by 1675 or leave his position as the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics.9

He suffered in silence. He could not reveal his true belief about the nature of Jesus to anyone. To do this, he would be labeled a heretic, excommunicated from the Church of England and thrown out of Cambridge. He started hinting that he was going to have to leave the University.9

Newton studied the Bible to find arguments to back up his beliefs. He wrote out 12 statements in his notebook that explained his point of view. The Trinity is nowhere mentioned in the Bible, he wrote.9 

Newton traveled to London to present his case before the head of the Church of England, King Charles II. It is likely that he had help from an old friend and college professor Isaac Barrow who was now an Anglican Priest and adviser to the king.9 Somehow they made his case without revealing his secret views of the Trinity. Apparently, they presented an argument showing that the ordination requirement was bad policy. Because, not only was Newton’s requirement dropped, but the requirement of ordination was ended for everyone.

So, was Isaac Newton a Christian heretic? The answer to this question may be found in your answer to another question: Which one understood the truth? Isaac Newton or Athanasias?

“There are more sure marks of authenticity in the Bible than in any profane history”– Isaac Newton

Newton believed he should communicate his understanding of Bible prophecy to others through his writing. He did not believe that he was chosen of God to do this, as some critics have claimed. Rather, he felt compelled to share his understanding of prophetic scripture for the “benefit of others, remembering the judgment of him who hid his talent in a napkin.”10

“My greatest friend is truth”

It was revealed to the prophet Daniel, Newton wrote, that the prophecies of the last times should be closed up and sealed until the time of the end. But, he asked, “If they are never to be understood, to what end did God reveal them?” He believed that in time as the fulfillment of prophecies came to pass that a few that call themselves Christians who “set themselves sincerely & earnestly to search after truth” will understand and their knowledge will be increased. While, on the other hand, the wicked shall not understand.10

Newton believed that every one should seek the truth for themselves, through scripture and by asking God

Newton implored all who were seeking for truth to not trust the opinion any man, saying:

“Let me therefore beg of thee not to trust to the opinion of any man concerning these things, for so it is great odds but thou shalt be deceived. Much less oughtest thou to rely upon the judgment of the multitude, for so thou shalt certainly be deceived. But search the scriptures thy self & that by frequent reading & constant meditation upon what thou readest, & earnest prayer to God to enlighten thine understanding if thou desirest to find the truth.”10

Newton knew that before Christ returned to the earth the truth would be reestablished on the earth. How he believed this would happen, however, I do not know.

“The 7th Trumpet at which time ceases & the mystery of God is finished (Apoc 10.6, 7) & the Kingdoms of the world become the kingdoms of Christ for ever & the dead here judged & saints rewarded.”7

Just before this will happen, Newton believed, there will be an universal preaching of the Gospel throughout the world:

“After the greatest decay of religion there is to be an universal preaching of the Gospel immediately before the seventh Trumpet … But this is not yet fulfilled; there has been nothing done in the world like it, & therefore it is to come.”11

Isaac Newton’s deepest secret

Newton’s fame came through his great scientific achievements. However, the Bible and not nature had been Isaac Newton’s greatest passion. He devoted more time to Scripture than to science. He said, “I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by those who were inspired. I study the Bible daily.”

Nevertheless, Isaac Newton’s religious views of 1670 remained his deepest secret. His vast store of controversial theological writings remained unpublished throughout his life. They remained unknown for 266 years, until his papers were bought in an auction and published in 1936.9

By that time, his biblical prediction of a world wide preaching of the gospel had begun. And, on a hot day in July 1897 two missionaries from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints knocked on the door of Harry and Mary Chamberlain. According to Familysearch Relative Finder, Harry Chamberlain is a first cousin six times removed of Sir Isaac Newton.

Other Stories:

See Chapter 22- Mary Ellis Chamberlain: The Mormons Return to Iowa. 
Mary Ellis’ father grew up near Palmyra New York in 1827 and heard news reports of the discovery of the Book of Mormon. Her brother was a preacher who spoke against the Mormons. Two missionaries were sent to Spencer Iowa to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ in the 1890s without purse or script. They received no compensation. They served with prayers and a promise that: “The honest in heart shall be prepared to receive thy testimony, to feed and clothe and give thee money”.

Chapter E18- The Promise of Passover in the Last Days 
Jewish tradition, Bible prophecy, and a promise of Passover in the last days. Temples and the ordinance of Passover. A call to prepare to meet the Bridegroom. A Latter-day Saint perspective of “The Rapture”. One temple dedication that fulfills Bible prophecy and may foretell the beginning of the tribulation.

Comments and questions welcome. Contact me by email click here.

© Copyright Dennis D. Chamberlain, The Chamberlain Story, 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of the written content of this site without express and written permission from the author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that credit is given to Dennis D. Chamberlain and direction to  www.thechamberlainstory.com.

Nineteen year-old Isaac Newton’s list of 57 sins12

Isaac Newton made this list when he was nineteen-years-old which include some offenses dating back to when he was 10-years-old or younger. The list was written to God and therefore, I doubt he ever intended that it be published. It told of what he believed were the worst things he had done in his life. However, it gives us great insight into his personality as a young man and about the times in which he lived.

Before Whitsunday 1662
1. Using the word (God) openly
2. Eating an apple at Thy house
3. Making a feather while on Thy day
4. Denying that I made it
5. Making a mousetrap on Thy day
6. Contriving of the chimes on Thy day
7. Squirting water on Thy day
8. Making pies on Sunday night
9. Swimming in a kimnel on Thy day
10. Putting a pin in John Keys hat on Thy day to pick him.

11. Carelessly hearing and committing many sermons
12. Refusing to go to the closet at my mothers command.
13. Threatening my father and mother Smith to burne them and the house over them
14. Wishing death and hoping it to some
15. Striking many
16. Having uncleane thoughts words and actions and dreamese.
17. Stealing cherry cobs from Eduard Storer
18. Denying that I did so
19. Denying a crossbow to my mother and grandmother though I knew of it
20. Setting my heart on money learning pleasure more than Thee

21. A relapse
22. A relapse
23. A breaking again of my covenant renued in the Lords Supper.
24. Punching my sister
25. Robbing my mothers box of plums and sugar
26. Calling Dorothy Rose a jade
27. Glutiny in my sickness.
28. Peevishness with my mother.
29. With my sister.
30. Falling out with the servants

31. Divers commissions of alle my duties
32. Idle discourse on Thy day and at other times
33. Not turning nearer to Thee for my affections
34. Not living according to my belief
35. Not loving Thee for Thy self.
36. Not loving Thee for Thy goodness to us
37. Not desiring Thy ordinances
38. Not long {longing} for Thee in {illeg}
39. Fearing man above Thee
40. Using unlawful means to bring us out of distresses

41. Caring for worldly things more than God
42. Not craving a blessing from God on our honest endeavors.
43. Missing chapel.
44. Beating Arthur Storer.
45. Peevishness at Master Clarks for a piece of bread and butter.
46. Striving to cheat with a brass halfe crowne.
47. Twisting a cord on Sunday morning
48. Reading the history of the Christian champions on Sunday

Since Whitsunday 1662
49. Glutony
50. Glutony
51. Using Wilfords towel to spare my own
52. Negligence at the chapel.
53. Sermons at Saint Marys (4)
54. Lying about a louse
55. Denying my chamberfellow of the knowledge of him that took him for a sot.
56. Neglecting to pray 3
57. Helping Pettit to make his water watch at 12 of the clock on Saturday nigh

References:

1- Charles E. Hummel, The Faith Behind the Famous Isaac Newton,
2- Justo L. Gonzalez, The Strory of Christianity, Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation, (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1984) pp. 158-166
3- John Burnaby, The Belief of Christendom, A Commentary of the Nicene Creed (London National Society: SPCK, 1959), p5
4- Justo L. Gonzalez, The Strory of Christianity, Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation, (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1984) pp. 174-179
5- Isaac Newton, The Newton Project, Theological Notes (part 3), National Library of Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.

6- Willaim Stukely, Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton’s Life, published in 1752 http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/OTHE00001
7- Isaac Newton, Untitled Treatise on Revelation Section 1.2.  http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00137
8- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Religious views of Isaac Newton
9- Kerrie Logan Hollihan, Isaac Newton and Physics for Kids, Chicago Review Press.
10- Isaac Newton, Untitled Treatise on Revelation Section 1.1. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00135
11- Isaac Newton, Untitled Treatise on Revelation Section 1.4. http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00182
12- Isaac Newton, Fitzwilliam Notebook, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, UK, Published online: October 2003

Key phrase Bible, Bible, Bible, Bible.

E5- Sir Isaac Newton, Our (Almost) Direct Ancestor

Spencer Chamberlain’s family connection to Sir Isaac Newton

Most of Spencer Chamberlain’s family are (almost) direct descendants of Sir Isaac Newton through Jonas Phillips. His daughter Betsy Phillips married Alonzo Chamberlain and his son Samuel married Jeanette Chamberlain. Most of Spencer’s progeny come from these two families. Thereby, they are descendants of Jonas Phillips and (almost) direct descendants of Sir Isaac Newton.

Almost?

Yes. Sir Isaac Newton had no children and therefore, he has no direct descendants. Also, his father, Isaac Newton, Sr., died before Isaac Jr. was born. He was the only child of Isaac and Hannah Newton with no full siblings.  Therefore, first cousin (X) times removed is about as close as it is possible to being a direct descendant of Sir Isaac Newton. Jonas Phillips is his first cousin (4) times removed.

It follows that the descendants of these two families of Spencer Chamberlain are also his first cousins (X) times removed. For example, Jonas Phillips (4), Betsy Phillips (5), John Harry Chamberlain (6), Harry Ellis Chamberlain (7), Ernest M. Chamberlain (8) and myself Dennis Chamberlain a first cousin (9) times removed of Sir Isaac Newton.

(Note: This genealogy is in Familysearch.org Relative Finder. However, whether the Richard Newton who came from England to Massachusetts in 1639 was Sir Isaac Newton’s uncle is based on circumstantial evidence.)

Early Life of Isaac Newton

E5 Isaac Newton (This is actually a portrait of Edmond Haley by Thomas Murray ca 1690)

Isaac Newton (This is actually a portrait of Edmond Haley by Thomas Murray ca 1690)

Isaac Newton was born on Christmas Day in 1642* in the manor of Woolsthorp, near the village of Colsterworth, Lincolnshire, England. He was three months premature, and was so small, his mother said he could fit into a quart mug.1

His father, Isaac Newton, Sr. was a well to do but illiterate farmer. He died on October 6, 1642 three months before Isaac Jr. was born. Our direct ancestor, Isaac Jr’s grandfather Robert Isaac Newton had died in Lincolnshire in 1641. His uncle Richard Newton had sailed to America in about 1639 where he settled in Sudbury, Massachusetts Bay Colony.2

Isaac’s mother, Hannah Ayscough, remarried when he was three years old. Her new husband, Barnabas Smith, was a wealthy minister of the church in a nearby village. However, Reverend Smith did not accept the three-year-old Isaac as part of the arrangement. He left him in the care of his grandmother Margery Ayscough. Isaac’s childhood was very lonely and he had bitter feelings for his mother and step father. His stepfather died in 1653.4

Isaac lodged with the Clark family in Grantham when he attended Free Grammar School. School reports there described him as “idle” and “inattentive”.1 “But every one that knew Isaac… when he was at school, recount with admiration the many instances of the extraordinary of his genius, whilst a boy; his strange inventions, uncommon skill & industry in mechanical works.”7

His mother, however, felt he might do better at managing her significant property and estate. She took him out of school. Isaac showed little interest or aptitude in financial management.

His uncle William Ayscough must have seen some promise in his young nephew because he persuaded his mother to let Isaac return to Grammar school to complete his education. He returned in 1660 and lodged with Mr. Stokes.  Stokes was headmaster of the school and recognized Isaac’s potential. He persuaded his mother to let him enter the university.1

Newton entered Trinity College Cambridge, on 5 June 1661 as a sizar. A sizar was a student that received an allowance toward college expenses in exchange for such tasks as waiting tables and cleaning other student’s rooms.1 One of Newton’s self confessed transgressions seems to show he had a need of money, a desire to learn, and enjoyment of college life:

“Setting my heart on money learning pleasure more than Thee.”

Newton’s list of sins3

In 1662 Isaac wrote a very personal list of his sins. The nineteen-year-old was very candid and likely intended this list to be viewed only by himself and God to whom it was written. After all, it is a record of what he considered to be worst things he had ever done in his life!

Since it mentions his step father Smith who died in 1653, he seems to be expressing some remorse for threats and thoughts he had when he was a child less than 10-years-old.

“Threatning my father and mother Smith to burne them and the house over them.” “Wishing death and hoping it to some.”

He divided his list between sins of the past (Before Whitsunday 1662), and more recent. (After Whitsunday 1662). Whitsundy was a celebration about seven weeks after Easter, near the end of his first year at Cambridge.

The entire list of his 57 sins can be found at the end of chapter E6 on Newton’s religion and theology.  The list gives us an intimate view of the feelings of the young college student and budding genius. It may also show this was a time of religious awakening for him, and an attempt at repentance, and a desire to do better.

Trinity College at Cambridge

At Cambridge he studied the philosophy of Aristotle, Descartes, Gassendi, Hobbes and Boyle; the astronomy of Galileo and the optics of Kepler. His interest in math began in 1663 when he read Euclid’s Elements, Oughred’s Clavis Mathematica, Descartes’ La Géométrie and other major works of mathematics.

Cambridge University

He recorded his thoughts in a book which he entitled Quaestiones Quaedam Philosophicae. It is a fascinating account of how Newton’s ideas were forming around 1664. He headed the text with an expression of his freedom of thought and passionate search for truth:

“Plato is my friend, Aristotle is my friend, but my best friend is truth.”

Newton’s first original mathematical work may have come as he studied Wallis’ Algebra. Wallis’ method for finding a square of equal area to a parabola and a hyperbola used indivisibles. Newton made notes but also devised his own proofs of the theorems writing:

“Thus Wallis doth it, but it may be done thus ...”

Newton was elected a scholar on 28 April 1664 and received his bachelor’s degree in April 1665.1

The 1665 Plague of London

Bubonic Plague also known as the Black Death had been known in England for centuries. It was a horrible disease. The victim’s skin turned black in patches and inflamed glands or ‘buboes’ in the groin, combined with vomiting, swollen tongue and severe headaches.5

The Plague 1665 London

The epidemic started slowly in 1665 London. It is believed that a traveler brought in some laundry full of fleas infected with the disease. The plague grew at an alarming rate causing Trinity College at Cambridge to close it doors. The students went home including Isaac Newton.

By May of 1665, 43 had died. In June 6137 people died, in July 17036 people and at its peak in August, 31159 people died. In all, 15% of the population perished during that terrible summer.5

In 1666 the Great Fire of London destroyed much of the center of London, but this helped to kill off some of the black rats and fleas that carried the plague.5

The legend of the apple

Newton returned to his childhood home and farm in at Woolsthorpe manor in Lincolnshire to avoid the plague. There he lived with his extended family consisting of his mother, his grandmother, one half-brother, and two half-sisters.

Myth vs Reality

It was at this time and location which found Isaac sitting in an apple orchard. (There is no evidence that an apple actually hit him on the head.) Nevertheless, while enjoying a “contempative mood” he watched the occasional apple fall to the ground. It was then, the notion of gravitation came into his mind:1

“Why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground,” thought he to himself. “Why should it not go sideways, or upwards? but constantly to the earths center? Assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it. There must be a drawing power in matter and the sum of the drawing power in the matter of the earth must be in the earths center, not in any side of the earth. Therefore dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the center. If matter thus draws matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. Therefore the apple draws the earth, as well as the earth draws the apple.”7

Isaac Newton’s home, Woolsthorp Manor, Lincolnshire, England

During this time at home Isaac also studied light. He found that when a thin beam of sunlight passes through a glass prism it formed a spectrum of colors. Therefore, he came to the conclusion that white light is not a simple entity.

In addition to these projects, he spent his time developing the foundations for differential and integral calculus. Several years later this was independently discovery by Leibniz.1

Isaac Newton returns to the University

When the University at Cambridge reopened in 1667, Newton was elected to a minor fellowship at Trinity College.  However, after being awarded his Master’s Degree, he was elected to a major fellowship. This allowed him to dine at the Fellows’ Table.1

That year the Dutch attacked the the British fleet at the mouth of the Thames. They came up the river with a great fleet and burnt many of the British ships inflicting great damage. The students as far as Cambridge could hear the gun fire. The cause was well known by all, but only Isaac recognized situation of the battle. He boldly pronounced that Dutch had beaten the British fleet. The news soon confirmed it and the curious would not relax until Isaac would satisfy them of his mode of intelligence. He told them that by carefully listening to the sound, he found it grew louder and louder, consequently came nearer. From this he rightly inferred that the Dutch were victors.7

In July 1669 one of his professors, Isaac Barrow, sent his work out to renown mathematicians.  This ensured Newton’s achievements became known to the world.1

Problems arise in his career

In 1672 Newton was elected a fellow of the Royal Society after he donated a reflecting telescope. Also, that year Newton published his first scientific paper on light and color in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. The paper was well accepted and Isaac Newton is on top of the world in his career. 

However, he had a big problem. He was holding a secret deep inside that was tearing him up. No one knows. If they did, his career and reputation would come crashing down.

As a professor at Trinity College, it was required that he take holy orders and become an ordained priest in the Church of England. This meant that he had to swear an oath on the Bible that he believed in the Trinity. This he could not do. Finding a solution to this problem seemed impossible, even for Isaac Newton.  

 In addition to this problem, Newton’s relations with another scientist, Robert Hooke, deteriorated. In 1675, Hooke claimed that Newton had stolen some of his optical results. The two men made up with an exchange of polite letters. Nevertheless, Newton turned away from the Royal Society, as Hooke was one of its leaders. He delayed publication of his research on the theory of light and color Opticks until after the death of Hooke.1

In 1687, Newton first published “Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy” a landmark work which states that every body in the universe is attracted to every other body with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This publication also featured his three laws of motion.6

This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being– The Principia, –Isaac Newton

Newton’s defense of Cambridge University

A Roman Catholic, James II became king of Great Britain in 1685. When a Protestant rebellion arose James put it down. He then began to appoint only Catholics to positions of power such as army officers, judges and officers of the state. Therefore, vacant positions at the University of Cambridge were only being filled with Catholics. Newton, a staunch Protestant, strongly opposed this and considered this an attack on the University. The King insisted that a Benedictine monk be given a degree without taking any examinations or swearing the required oaths. Newton strongly objected. He prepared documents to defend the University and argued the case against the King.1

On November 5, 1688, William of Orange from the Dutch Republic, landed his army in southern England. British political and religious leaders supported the invasion.  Therefore, there was little resistance as Protestants defected from King  James’ army.  The “Glorious Revolution” deposed James who fled to France. William and Mary then reigned together in his place.8

In 1689, Newton famous for his strong defense of the University, was elected to the Convention of Parliament. He was now a leader of the university and one of the most eminent mathematicians in the world.

Government Service

Newton suffered a nervous breakdown in 1693 and retired from research.  He left Cambridge in 1696 and took a government position in London. He becoming Warden of the Royal Mint and then Master of the mint in 1699. This position, combined with income from his estates, made him very wealthy. He lead the mint through a difficult period of re-coinage and actively pursued measures to prevent coin counterfeiting.1

In 1703 the Royal Society elected him president, and re-elected him each year for the rest of his life. Queen Anne knighted him in 1705, the first scientist so honored for his work.1 Sir Isaac afterward, went to evening service at king’s college chapel. There he gave a speech for her Majesty and presented her with a richly ornamented bible.7

To be Continued…. 

Isaac Newton sought for truth both in science and theology. He was a student of the Bible and of the history of the early Christian Church. His massive writings of religion and theology contained his deepest secret and were not published until 1936. See Isaac Newton: The Athanasian Creed and Bible Prophecy.

If you got this far, please click Goodbye or Table of Contents. This will simply tell me that someone looked at this post. Thank you! Dennis Chamberlain

© Copyright Dennis D. Chamberlain, The Chamberlain Story, 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of the written content of this site without express and written permission from the author and owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that credit is given to Dennis D. Chamberlain and direction to  www.thechamberlainstory.com.

References:

*Isaac Newtons was born on Christmas day, but it was on January 4, 1643 by the “corrected” Gregorian calendar.

1- http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Newton.html
2- http://josfamilyhistory.com/htm/hopkins/robinson/robinson-leonard-newton.htm
3- Isaac Newton, Fitzwilliam Notebook, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, UK, Published online: October 2003
4- Never at Rest: A biography of Issac Newton.
5- http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/The-Great-Plague/
6- http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-an-apple-really-fall-on-isaac-newtons-head
7- Willaim Stukely*, Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton’s Life, published in 1752 http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/OTHE00001
*(Note: In 1726, Newton shared the apple anecdote with William Stukeley, who included it in his biography of Newton.)
8- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_III_of_England